Buy commercial curl support from WolfSSL. We help you work
out your issues, debug your libcurl applications, use the API, port to new
platforms, add new features and more. With a team lead by the curl founder
himself.
Re: WSAPoll() anyone?
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: Gisle Vanem via curl-library <curl-library_at_lists.haxx.se>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 07:33:51 +0200
Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> Is there a compelling reason to switch over to WSAPoll()?
>
> It took a long time before we found that poll issue the last time. If there is an edge case still where they aren't
> compatible, I can imagine it won't be easy to reproduce but might introduce strange hard-to-debug side effects down the
> line.
I would just like to hear if other Windows users here have
an opinion or what experience they have with 'WSAPoll()'.
It can't b that bad still?
> Since we don't know in which Windows version the function was fixed, we might still have curl users with broken WSAPoll
> implementations - even if more recent versions work better.
That would be a problem, yes.
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 07:33:51 +0200
Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> Is there a compelling reason to switch over to WSAPoll()?
>
> It took a long time before we found that poll issue the last time. If there is an edge case still where they aren't
> compatible, I can imagine it won't be easy to reproduce but might introduce strange hard-to-debug side effects down the
> line.
I would just like to hear if other Windows users here have
an opinion or what experience they have with 'WSAPoll()'.
It can't b that bad still?
> Since we don't know in which Windows version the function was fixed, we might still have curl users with broken WSAPoll
> implementations - even if more recent versions work better.
That would be a problem, yes.
-- --gv -- Unsubscribe: https://lists.haxx.se/listinfo/curl-library Etiquette: https://curl.se/mail/etiquette.htmlReceived on 2022-07-06