Buy commercial curl support from WolfSSL. We help you work
out your issues, debug your libcurl applications, use the API, port to new
platforms, add new features and more. With a team lead by the curl founder
himself.
Re: help making a cmake check for _Atomic?
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: Cristian Rodríguez via curl-library <curl-library_at_lists.haxx.se>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2022 18:39:16 -0400
On Sun, Jun 12, 2022 at 6:18 PM Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 12 Jun 2022, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
>
> > That does not appear to be the right way..
> >
> > __STDC_NO_ATOMICS__ means _Atomic is *not* implemented .
> >
> > it is not a library feature.
>
> I don't understand this remark. We don't check for __STDC_NO_ATOMICS__ at
> all?
In the referenced PR there is no check on __STDC_NO_ATOMICS__ which is
actually the only thing that matters. _Atomic need implementation
defined compiler support.
http://port70.net/~nsz/c/c11/n1570.html#7.17
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2022 18:39:16 -0400
On Sun, Jun 12, 2022 at 6:18 PM Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 12 Jun 2022, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
>
> > That does not appear to be the right way..
> >
> > __STDC_NO_ATOMICS__ means _Atomic is *not* implemented .
> >
> > it is not a library feature.
>
> I don't understand this remark. We don't check for __STDC_NO_ATOMICS__ at
> all?
In the referenced PR there is no check on __STDC_NO_ATOMICS__ which is
actually the only thing that matters. _Atomic need implementation
defined compiler support.
http://port70.net/~nsz/c/c11/n1570.html#7.17
-- Unsubscribe: https://lists.haxx.se/listinfo/curl-library Etiquette: https://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.htmlReceived on 2022-06-13