Buy commercial curl support from WolfSSL. We help you work
out your issues, debug your libcurl applications, use the API, port to new
platforms, add new features and more. With a team lead by the curl founder
himself.
Re: curl_multi_timeout and the multi_socket API
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: Fulup Ar Foll via curl-library <curl-library_at_cool.haxx.se>
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2021 00:06:30 +0200
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: https://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette: https://curl.se/mail/etiquette.html
Received on 2021-04-04
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2021 00:06:30 +0200
I'm not sure to understand your logic.
If you have to call curl_multi_timeout() at each iteration of your
mainloop your logic should be wrong.
I also mix curl-socket with multiple
other classes of sockets and do no call call curl_multi_timeout()
at each iteration.
In my sample the eventloop call 'glueOnSocketCB' as soon as a curlsocket is
readable. 'glueOnSocketCB' map
mainloop event-names to curl-events name before calling 'httpOnSocketCB' that finally call
curl_multi_socket_action to do the job. If you do so, you do
not have to call curl_multi_socket_action.
The secret is to map your main loop event-name to curl-names.
In my code
'glueOnSocketCB' is attached to mainloop within glueSetSocketCB
that is called from multiSetSockCB. This last
one is call from curl with " curl_multi_setopt(httpPool->multi, CURLMOPT_SOCKETFUNCTION,
multiSetSockCB);"
For the timer you do not need an
external lib, you may use timerfd and epool is just as find as any
other mainloop. In my case I use systemd mainloop, because this
what the rest of the application uses. I did libuv to make sure my
code was independent of the mainloop, in case app developper would
like to change in the future. I did not port for epool/timerfd,
but I'm sure that it would not take more that few hours.
On 03/04/2021 23:13, Henrik Holst
wrote:
Den lör 3 apr. 2021 kl 22:56 skrev Fulup Ar Foll <fulup.arfoll_at_iot.bzh>:
I was not speaking about waiting 1ms before the initial call, it was just an observation that the timer function callback was very often being called with timeout=0, timeout=1, timeout=-1 and that timeout=1 was the cause of my initial troubles since calling epoll_wait with 1ms timeout made it never return 0 to indicate timeout (since some other sockets that I had in the same epoll had recv traffic more often than that). Relying on epoll_wait() returning 0 works flawless if one only have curl sockets in the epoll so it was faulty logic when the application was expanded beyond handling only curl requests.Henrik,
I posted this sample on github because I lost too many hours searching for curl logic in the documentation. You have to respect curl_timeout, nevertheless if your mainloop works well, it should be call only once per download. In my case I do not wait 1ms before initial call and everything works perfectly well.
Anyway I've redone the logic anyway to minimize the overhead penalty of calling curl_multi_timeout() on each iteration of the main event loop and now actually uses the timer callback but instead of relying on epoll_wait() returning 0 I calculate when the timeout have timed out against the wallclock (clock_gettime() + timeout from the callback), and check that instead which I of course should have done from the beginning. That way the overhead is minimized (just a call to clock_gettime() wich for this specific implementation is overhead that I can live with) and there is no need for any external timers or event libs, just bog standard epoll.
/HH
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: https://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette: https://curl.se/mail/etiquette.html
Received on 2021-04-04