Buy commercial curl support from WolfSSL. We help you work
out your issues, debug your libcurl applications, use the API, port to new
platforms, add new features and more. With a team lead by the curl founder
himself.
Re: curl_multi_timeout and the multi_socket API
- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
From: Henrik Holst via curl-library <curl-library_at_cool.haxx.se>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 22:45:02 +0200
Den mån 5 apr. 2021 kl 22:43 skrev Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se>:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021, Henrik Holst wrote:
>
> > And this particular run with 1ms did not lead to 100% cpu, it was when
> curl
> > gave me 0ms as timeout as the last timeout which lead me to call
> > curl_multi_socket_action() every 0ms, which turned it into a busy wait
> loop
> > and hence the 100% cpu. Shouldn't curl return -1 as infinte timeout
> instead
> > there since it's waiting for read on a connected socket (after having
> sent
> > the request in full) with no defined CURLOPT_TIMEOUT?
>
> 0 means that there's a timeout pending that libcurl wants to take care of
> at
> once so then it can't return -1 since -1 means no timeout at all.
>
> So no, it cannot return -1 when it means 0.
>
Yeah, it turned out that my whole problem was that i misread the docs
"non-repeating timer" as "repeating timer" and that was the whole basis for
my confusion.
Sorry for this.
/HH
>
> --
>
> / daniel.haxx.se
> | Commercial curl support up to 24x7 is available!
> | Private help, bug fixes, support, ports, new features
> | https://www.wolfssl.com/contact/
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: https://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette: https://curl.se/mail/etiquette.html
Received on 2021-04-05
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 22:45:02 +0200
Den mån 5 apr. 2021 kl 22:43 skrev Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se>:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021, Henrik Holst wrote:
>
> > And this particular run with 1ms did not lead to 100% cpu, it was when
> curl
> > gave me 0ms as timeout as the last timeout which lead me to call
> > curl_multi_socket_action() every 0ms, which turned it into a busy wait
> loop
> > and hence the 100% cpu. Shouldn't curl return -1 as infinte timeout
> instead
> > there since it's waiting for read on a connected socket (after having
> sent
> > the request in full) with no defined CURLOPT_TIMEOUT?
>
> 0 means that there's a timeout pending that libcurl wants to take care of
> at
> once so then it can't return -1 since -1 means no timeout at all.
>
> So no, it cannot return -1 when it means 0.
>
Yeah, it turned out that my whole problem was that i misread the docs
"non-repeating timer" as "repeating timer" and that was the whole basis for
my confusion.
Sorry for this.
/HH
>
> --
>
> / daniel.haxx.se
> | Commercial curl support up to 24x7 is available!
> | Private help, bug fixes, support, ports, new features
> | https://www.wolfssl.com/contact/
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: https://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette: https://curl.se/mail/etiquette.html
Received on 2021-04-05