Daniel Stenberg (Thu, 2 Aug 2018 23:32:04 +0200 (CEST)):
>>Jan Ehrhardt's XP test was really slow and if we exclude that from the
>>results, the average patched result goes down to 46%.
>
>I also have a Windows 8.1 64-bits running in a Virtualbox on the Wondows
>2008 R2 server. No speed improvement. Most of the times the patched
>version is a little bit faster, but sometimes even slower. Typical
>result below.
>
>Windows 8.1 64-bits in a Virtualbox, Amsterdam, NL
>
>Microsoft Windows [Version 6.3.9600]
>generating test file...
>running vanilla...
>start:0,578000 total:5,312000
>running patched...
>start:0,594000 total:5,219000

The same happens with other Windows versions in a Virtualbox (on the
Win2k8 server).

Windows 8.1 32 bits

Microsoft Windows [Version 6.3.9600]
generating test file...
running vanilla...
start:0,735000 total:5,219000
running patched...
start:0,578000 total:5,218000

Windows 10 64 bits

Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.17134.165]
generating test file...
running vanilla...
start:0,562000 total:5,062000
running patched...
start:0,562000 total:5,062000

-- 
Jan
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: https://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette:   https://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html