cURL / Mailing Lists / curl-library / Single Mail


Re: Gopher [Was ""]

From: Daniel Stenberg <>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 23:20:31 +0100 (CET)

On Fri, 26 Feb 2016, bch wrote:

> ...and I'm seeing what appears to be poor gopher URI handling:

It just shows how many people are actually using gopher with (lib)curl

> or am I misinterpetting what the URI really ought to be?

Is there anyone around who still remembers how gopher URLs should be
constructed? =) I certainly don't.

Yet we have a few test cases that verify gopher functionality. So either that
was a wrong URL or our tests are just too incomplete.

List admin:
Received on 2016-02-26