On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, Marc Hoersken wrote:

>> I was first going to agree and then a second thought struck me. Why would
>> it ever need to handle more data? If it gets called asking for 20K of data,
>> there's nothing in the API that says the function must return that much. We
>> can safely just make BUFSIZE the maximum amount of data the schannel_recv()
>> function can return without it breaking any properly written code!
>>
>> It would simplify the code without breaking anything...
>
> That's a good plan.

Would you be able to write up a patch for this? As I don't build for or use
Windows myself I will only mess up some little detail if I try to write this
"blindly" ...

-- 
  / daniel.haxx.se
-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette:  http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html