> I'm not at all convinced that an established "process" is what we need for
> this, or at least that we can make one until we get more people involved.

> I'm more interested in just getting more eyeballs on the patches and
comments
> on them posted to the list. Many times, other people than me can point out
> problems and quirks with them, or even say that they look and/or work
fine. Or
> run tests on their hosts with them applied to see that they still run the
> tests fine etc.

Of course. I'm wasn't hinting at something very formal. You should be able
however to at least sort the patches by relevance and priority, so that
people (like myself) will know where to put their effort. I think it will be
important to guide people as to what kind of input you are looking for. This
will minimize the chance of someone putting a lot of effort which you can
not benefit from (for example testing and possibly correcting a problem on
some weird platform nobody but himself is using).

Cheers,
Shmul
Received on 2007-03-11