On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Jerry G. Chiuan wrote:

> > A bit above the previous quote, RFC2616 says:
> >
> > Clients SHOULD include both header fields when a no-cache
> > request is sent to a server not known to be HTTP/1.1 compliant.
>
> Sorry, my english is not good enough to understand its description
> what does it mean by a server "not known to be HTTP/1.1 compliant" ?

That you don't know if the proxy supports 1.1 or not..

> Does it mean there are still certain servers which don't follow HTTP/1.1?

Yes there are.

-- 
 Daniel Stenberg -- curl: been grokking URLs since 1998
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo
The Event For Linux Datacenter Solutions & Strategies in The Enterprise 
Linux in the Boardroom; in the Front Office; & in the Server Room 
http://www.enterpriselinuxforum.com