On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Piotr Dobrogost <curlpp_at_2008.autoera.pl>wrote:

> Jean-Philippe Barette-LaPierre wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Piotr Dobrogost
> > <curlpp_at_2008.autoera.pl <mailto:curlpp_at_2008.autoera.pl>> wrote:
> >
> > Jean
> >
> > .inl files are included in headers but sematically they are more
> > source then header files.
> > I'm writing this because with the previous folder structure I put
> > all .inl files in the header section of VC project but now I think
> > they would rather be put in the source section of the project. This
> > doesn't make any difference in build since there is no build rule
> > for them. It's kind of philosophic problem :)
>
> > I disagree with you. For libraries that would need to include files from
> > cURLpp it would be a serious problem not having those files.
>
> Jean
>
> I didn't make it clear. I'm not talking about neither deleting/moving these
> files nor changing anything in these files.
> In VC project tree there are by default two categories of files; source and
> header. These are not physical folders but conceptual ones. I was only
> refering to conceptual placement of .inl files in the source category rather
> than the header category. Nothing in the project tree changes. Nothing in
> the way library is used (as always by including all headers from include
> folder (which in turn includes all .inl files) changes.
>

Then, I'm not be able to discuss this issue with you, since I don't know
what would be the impacts. What do you think Andrei?

>
> Regards
> Piotr Dobrogost
> _______________________________________________
> cURLpp mailing list
> cURLpp_at_rrette.com
> http://www.rrette.com/mailman/listinfo/curlpp
>

_______________________________________________
cURLpp mailing list
cURLpp_at_rrette.com
http://www.rrette.com/mailman/listinfo/curlpp
Received on 2008-11-16