Jean-Philippe Barette-LaPierre wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Piotr Dobrogost
> <curlpp_at_2008.autoera.pl <mailto:curlpp_at_2008.autoera.pl>> wrote:
>
> Jean
>
> .inl files are included in headers but sematically they are more
> source then header files.
> I'm writing this because with the previous folder structure I put
> all .inl files in the header section of VC project but now I think
> they would rather be put in the source section of the project. This
> doesn't make any difference in build since there is no build rule
> for them. It's kind of philosophic problem :)

> I disagree with you. For libraries that would need to include files from
> cURLpp it would be a serious problem not having those files.

Jean

I didn't make it clear. I'm not talking about neither deleting/moving these files nor changing anything in these files.
In VC project tree there are by default two categories of files; source and header. These are not physical folders but conceptual ones. I was only refering to conceptual placement of .inl files in the source category rather than the header category. Nothing in the project tree changes. Nothing in the way library is used (as always by including all headers from include folder (which in turn includes all .inl files) changes.

Regards
Piotr Dobrogost
_______________________________________________
cURLpp mailing list
cURLpp_at_rrette.com
http://www.rrette.com/mailman/listinfo/curlpp
Received on 2008-11-16