Re: curl vs wget
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 01:49:55 -0700 (PDT)
--- Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se> wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
> >> where wget is just for downloading.
> > - correct, but there is also 'wput'.
> > So it might make sense to compare cURL <-> (wget + wput).
> I disagree. I compare two specific tools. wput is a third tool and if I would
> include that it would be a comparison between curl and "wget together with
> another random FTP uploaing tool".
> Commercial curl and libcurl Technical Support: http://haxx.se/curl.html
I don't understand your logic.
cURL does both download and upload, right ?
wget does just download, wput - just upload.
If you insist on comparing cURL <-> wget, why did you choose wget and wput ?
That is, why did you choose only download-capable counterpart and not
only upload-capable counterpart ?
Since wget and wput are complementary tools which, when combined in a "bundle",
make possible both download and upload, it looks logical to compare
cURL to (wget + wput).
Applications From Scratch: http://appsfromscratch.berlios.de/
Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo! FareChase.
Received on 2007-10-05