On Thu, 2 Aug 2018, Gisle Vanem wrote:

> But that server is 19 hops away. Testing with the same
> file via ftp to my server in Denmark (11 hops) shows a
> bit worse result:
> running vanilla...
> start:0,406000 total:1,219000
> running patched...
> start:0,359000 total:1,531000
>
> Seems ftp is maxing my line here. Maybe little to do with Winsock tuning.

Maybe, still interesting that the patched version turned 25% worse and thereby
this is the only test we've seen so far that did so!

Even including this test (and we've received 11 numbers so far), the patched
version *average* at 51% of the time of the vanilla build.

Jan Ehrhardt's XP test was really slow and if we exclude that from the
results, the average patched result goes down to 46%.

Remarkable improvements!

The 11 tests seen so far has been done with these Windows versions:

10.0.16299.547
10.0.17134.112
10.0.17134.165
10.0.17134.191
10.0.17713.1002
5.1.2600
6.1.7601

It would still help with more data - especially if you happen to run other
versions or happen to sit on networks far away from the
uploadjp.openspeedtest.com server.

-- 
  / daniel.haxx.se
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: https://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette:   https://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html