On Thu, 6 May 2010, Howard Chu wrote:

> librtmp doesn't like non-blocking sockets; we normally just use a receive
> timeout. So that's what I've done here; it would be rather painful to change
> this behavior...

The downside may not be that obvious or big, but it may hamper how good RTMP
works together with other protocols when the multi interface is used. But I'm
totally willing to go with whatever works now as it can always be improved in
the future.

-- 
  / daniel.haxx.se
-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette:  http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html