RE: naming convention of targets for Windows platform - why not useVC style?
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:48:15 -0500
I'm showing up late to this conversation I'm afraid, but I do use the
makefiles. I do have to tweak them in order to enable building the
symbol files( compatible with symbol stores ) for release and debug
Although to be honest, by the time I'm done with the tweaks, the only
thing that builds is libcurl itself. That is why I hadn't submitted a
patch for it.
[mailto:curl-library-bounces_at_cool.haxx.se] On Behalf Of Piotr Dobrogost
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 11:45 AM
Subject: Re: naming convention of targets for Windows platform - why not
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:39:48 +0100 (CET)
> From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se>
> Subject: Re: naming convention of targets for Windows platform - why
> not use VC style?
> I don't think we have a single developer who's
> actually using that makefile so to my knowledge there's nobody who
> provide any strong opinions on those details.
Why do you think so?
> Well "zlib-ssl-dll" as an example implies using zlib and ssl to create
It means to use static zlib and dynamic ssl.
The pattern is
Creating dll with zlib and ssl would be spelled as
Received on 2009-02-19