curl-library
Re: General direction, ftp vs html file upload and/or downloads
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 14:17:25 -0800
Hey Max,
Here's my 2 cents:
HTML uploads can be a strain on the server since it has to jump
through extra hoops (the web server) to get onto the server.
FTP is nice and light except it's unencrypted so people can sniff
username/passwords as well as the data you are uploading and
downloading.
If security is important and you want to be able to handle more
traffic, you might look into SFTP to get the benefits of both security
and power.
On 12/15/07, Max L. Eidswick <max_at_eidswick.com> wrote:
>
>
> Our company has used your library in our Version 6 products and now I would like to convert our Version 7 code to use the same
> library.
>
> We can use either ftp or html using your libcurl for uploads and downloads. Can you advise which you recommend? We are breaking
> all client upload files to 1MB, which we can make smaller or larger if that is a factor. We assemble the source file at the host.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Max
>
>
Received on 2007-12-15