> On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, 1983-01-06_at_gmx.net wrote:
>
> >> Why? It is included witht -isystem instead. Why is that good enough?
>
> > If it is supposed to be like that? I an not a make/C expert. Fixing it
> > manually make it work. That's what puzzles me.
>
> To me that seems to indicate a bug in your gcc version.
>
> We convert -I to -isystem for some things to make the headers included
> from
> that path to be treated as system headers by gcc. It has the advantage
> that
> for example gcc will ignore more problems/nits that aren't really ours.

Daniel,

I played a bit around with -isystem and -I in Makefiles, configure and manually. I came to the conclusion that my compiler version is fine. The error is only the order of header file inclusions. The header and C files from fbopenssl are messed up somehow in my opinion. I made a google investigation and found there two tickets:
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/23812
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/25600

I was able to reproduce the behavior of the first ticket.

Moreover, I seriously doubt that this will work at all. fbopenssl's files are broken. I wonder if anyone was able to compile everything successfully.
I would rather exclude fbopenssl from cURL support. A new approach directly with GSSAPI should be taken. Which definitively works. I would like to code that but my C knowledge is so limited that it would take way too long. libneon though has a working implementation.

Thanks,

Mike

-- 
NEU: FreePhone - 0ct/min Handyspartarif mit Geld-zurück-Garantie!		
Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone
-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-users
FAQ:        http://curl.haxx.se/docs/faq.html
Etiquette:  http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html