Re: CURLOPT_POST with no CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 22:00:49 +0100 (CET)
On Fri, 6 Mar 2020, Jason Proctor via curl-library wrote:
> Looking at the test case I think the issue is that I set CURLOPT_POST and 
> provide neither CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS nor a read function. If the API contract 
> says I have to do one or the other, fair enough - but should Curl survive if 
> I don't?
Okay but as a POST request implies a request body, where do you provide said 
body?
Without CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS (and *with* CURLOPT_POST set), libcurl only offers 
one other way to provide the request body and that is the read callback. If 
you don't set it, libcurl has a default read function that does an fread() by 
stdin by default.
What did you expect would happen? A zero byte body?
In my mind, CURLOPT_POST explains that you *either* use CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS or 
a read callback and that there's no third option, but I'm certainly open for 
that we need to extend or clarify the docs somewhere!
-- 
  / daniel.haxx.se | Commercial curl support up to 24x7 is available!
                   | Private help, bug fixes, support, ports, new features
                   | https://www.wolfssl.com/contact/
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: https://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette:   https://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
Received on 2020-03-06