Got it, thanks!

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se> wrote:

> On Thu, 23 Feb 2017, corey kasten wrote:
>
> I wouldn't mind seeing that supported withot having to use
>>> CURLOPT_CUSTOMREQUEST, no.
>>>
>>
>> Sorry, I couldn't tell whether you mean you would like to see that
>> supported and therefore *would* consider a feature request, or "no", you
>> wouldn't want it supported because it's unnecessary due to
>> CURLOPT_CUSTOMREQUEST allowing it to be worked around...
>>
>
> I actually don't care much for feature requests. It is very easy to have
> ideas and to ask for features but having a large set of requested features
> don't improve much for anyone. Actually making the feature happen is what
> takes skills, time and energy.
>
> I wouldn't mind if someone wrote code and introduced this sort of
> change/feature that would let an application to do PUT with
> CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS slightly nicer in libcurl. It could even be made in a
> way that made use of CURLOPT_CUSTOMREQUEST but perhaps with a way to set
> the custom request only for the first request and made following ones
> respect 30X responses for redirect follows. Or something.
>
>
> --
>
> / daniel.haxx.se
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Unsubscribe: https://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
> Etiquette: https://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: https://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette: https://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
Received on 2017-02-23