On Thu, 26 Jan 2017, Pawel Veselov wrote:

>> Agree. Then "synchronous" or "blocking".
>
> I also think it may be more important to add "change with" before the
> alternative options. It's crispy clear for some other cases, just not for
> this one.

But it would break the symmetry with all the other options. They all show the
current situation and within paretheses options that can change it.

What if we instead made it appear like this, with the left "label" being
changed to "async resolver"?

   Async resolver: no (--enable-ares / --enable-threaded-resolver)

-- 
  / daniel.haxx.se
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: https://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette:   https://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html