Michael Kaufmann wrote:
>
>> Should we consider providing another pointer for the OpenSSL backend?
>> Sure, I'm open for discussions and solutions!
>>
> Yes, please consider this. I propose to add a new CURLINFO constant,
> because the existing API must not be changed (backwards compatibility).
> We could call it CURLINFO_TLS_SESSION_EXTENDED or
> CURLINFO_TLS_SESSION_V2. It should work the same way as
> CURLINFO_TLS_SESSION, but with SSL* instead of SSL_CTX* for OpenSSL.

If I've been following along correctly, SSL_CTX* is a subset of SSL*, so how
about CURLINFO_TLS_SESSION_FULL ?

- Rich

-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
Received on 2015-09-30