On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 07:33:20PM +0200, Mohammad_AlSaleh wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 01:45:35PM +0200, Mohammad_AlSaleh wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > I followed the documentation's recommendation to use
> > CURLOPT_XFERINFOFUNCTION instead of CURLOPT_PROGRESSFUNCTION.
> >
> > Quoting the documentation:
> > "Unknown/unused argument values passed to the callback will be set to
> > zero"
> >
> > So, I had checks in place to test the values of ultotal and ulnow.
> >
> > I built my application with MinGW (32bit) today. And a test run in wine
> > shows non-zero values for ultotal. It was a simple HTTP download.
> >
> > Can anyone confirm this is a (probably harmless) bug in libcurl, and
> > not something faulty at my side?
>
> A little update.
>
> It looks like ultotal and dlnow are swapped for some reason. I'll try to
> figure out why.

Okay. It was my fault after all.
Sorry for the noise.

I was using off_t instead of curl_off_t as a type. I didn't notice my
rookie mistake earlier because I usually use an x86_64 GNU/Linux system
for development.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
Received on 2014-12-02