cURL / Mailing Lists / curl-library / Single Mail



From: Carlo Wood <>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:55:49 +0100

On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:18:10 +0100 (CET)
Daniel Stenberg <> wrote:

> On Sun, 23 Nov 2014, Carlo Wood wrote:
> > This allows the user to tweak the maximum number of connections per
> > host, the maximum number of requests in a pipeline and to override
> > blacklisting or implement whitelisting on a per host basis (since
> > bundles are only per host, not host:port - which imho is a
> > limitation).
> I would even consider it a bug. Services on different ports are
> totally unrelated of each other and we shouldn't combine anything
> over them without prior knowledge. So, I would argue that a host in
> that sense should be a host+port pair.
> Perhaps a sensible way is to fix that first?

Would you agree with calling snprintf(buf, bufsz, "%s:%d",,
remote_port); every time a bundle needs to be looked up? Or do you want
something that is faster (but will use more memory for an extra struct

Carlo Wood <>
List admin:
Received on 2014-11-25