On Mon, 8 Oct 2012, Mark Tully wrote:

> I can't make a strong case for removing the wait, I only hit it because of a
> loop I could have easily written a different way, but it would be useful to
> document it, like you say.

Yeah, one can also view it as the function should return as soon as there's no
more action to wait for anymore, which would then be immediately.

I would really love some more opinions on this.

Sara, did you give this any deeper thoughts or did it mostly end up like this
due to how poll() works?

-- 
  / daniel.haxx.se
-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette:  http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html