>
> "replacement for accept()" sounds like a good idea but in the second thought,
I do not find any use case in which an application would need to implement this
callback. On the other hand, applications may need to set socket options before
data transfer kicks off. I am going to prepare a patch for CURL_SOCKOPTFUNCTION
after accept() gets called and returned success. <at> Joe: Does this change make
it for you?
>
>

Thanks, that should work pretty well for me.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
Received on 2012-06-25