On Tuesday 07 February 2012 10:53:41 Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> It is also tempting to use this new option to allow for disabling possibly
> different work-arounds so perhaps a more generic CURLOPT_SSL_WORK_AROUND
> with a bitmask argument would make sense...

This definitely sounds best to me. I would take BEAST as one of the bits, so
that the control is common for both SSL backends. I will prepare a patch for
libcurl-NSS that applies on yours.

Kamil
-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
Received on 2012-02-07