On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, Mark Brand wrote:

> +# fixme: ugly workaround for loss of this gnutls function
> +void
> +gnutls_transport_set_global_errno (int err)
> +{
> +#ifdef _WIN32
> + /* Keep this in sync with system_errno */
> + switch (err)
> + {
> + case EAGAIN:
> + SetLastError (WSAEWOULDBLOCK);
> + break;

Is this really correct? The gnutls_transport_set_global_errno() gets called
with the input argument being gtls_EAGAIN, gtls_EINTR or gtls_EIO (as returned
by gtls_mapped_sockerrno) so it seems incorrect to assume that they match
EAGAIN and EINTR!

-- 
  / daniel.haxx.se
-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette:  http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html