> > Thanks! Thinking further, is there enough information available to recognize
> > the connection as not being "dirty" in this case and actually leave it open?
> > It appears that closing the connection in case when no data was sent out is
> > somewhat pessimistic and wastes a perfectly good connection.
>
> I guess it would be possible. If you happen to abort exactly after the
> connection is made but before the request is sent. Surely that time span is
> *very* brief in real life and the number of connections you cancel in that
> state should be very few? In other words: I doubt it is worth all the added
> code and logic for such a very slim chance.
>
> --

I take your point. I just thought that if it was a trivial fix then why not do it at the same time while we are on this subject.

-V
                                               
-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
Received on 2011-10-03