On 15/09/11 14:14, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011, Martin J. Evans wrote:
>
>> Benchmark: timing 1000 iterations of curl, lwp... curl: 20
>> wallclock secs ( 0.34 usr + 0.13 sys = 0.47 CPU) @ 2127.66/s
>> (n=1000) lwp: 26 wallclock secs ( 4.41 usr + 0.58 sys = 4.99 CPU) @
>> 200.40/s (n=1000)
>
> Ah, that's certainly a lot better. I can live with using a 10th as
> much CPU and still being faster. =)

So can I.

> Did you try with using CURLOPT_TCP_NODELAY for this way of posting as
> well to see if it made any difference?
>

Yes, but as you can imagine, now the post header and data is in one write it makes no difference.

Thanks again for your help.

Martin

-- 
Martin J. Evans
Easysoft Limited
http://www.easysoft.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette:  http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html