On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Amr Shahin <amrnablus_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello folks,
>
> i'm attaching a sample very small unit tests using both check unit testing
> library and the current curl testing framework integrated with curl, i was
> hoping we could asses both and see which is more suitable to write unit
> tests.
>
> the code uses check is in the file llist_test.c. It's a classic unit
> testing code, with all basic functions there setup, teardown and macros for
> defining your tests, the output is well organized, you can see sample output
> for both all success, and one failed test in the attached files.
> The only downside for using check is that we're adding an extra dependency
> to curl, my suggesstion is to add the .so version and check.h to the code
> base.
>
> the other option is to use the testing setup already in libtest directory,
> it's pretty easy to add more tests, but it's not as well-organized as using
> check, all the tests use a function "int test(char *URL)" which may not be
> suitable for unit tests.
>
> personally, i'm into using check. I'd love to hear what you guys think?
>

I like the Check library: it's C, it's maintained and it works with Unix and
Windows.

happy new year :)

Vincent Torri

-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
Received on 2011-01-01