> From: Jeff Pohlmeyer <yetanothergeek_at_gmail.com> Date: Mon, 23 Aug
> 2010 11:21:09 -0500
>
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Guenter wrote:
>
>> Did you already inform the author of PolarSSL about this prob? I
>> think that the right long term fix would be that PolarSSL learns
>> this 'unknown sig alg', or?
>
> I think the PolarSSL maintainer (Paul Bakker) was subscribed to this
> list so maybe he will notice this thread. Since polarssl is intended
> to be a very small ssl implementation, and it already handles 139 out
> of the 140 certs in the bundle, I'm not sure the extra weight would
> be worth it. But I really don't know how popular the
> ecdsa-with-SHA384 algorithm is in the wild, or how much effort it
> would be to implement, so if nobody responds here within a few days I
> will pass the info on to the polarssl mailing list.
>
> - Jeff

ECDSA signatures are indeed not supported at this moment in PolarSSL.
Most likely they will be in the 'near' future. But no specific timeline
has been made yet. ECDSA will be 'optional' to conserve on space when
required.

Best regards,
Paul
-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
Received on 2010-08-23