On Sat, 8 May 2010, Howard Chu wrote:

> Also notice that going this route means you don't need a separate check for
> ldaps support.

Okay, I must say that this looks like a much better and cleaner LDAP approach
than what we currently have.

Do you think there's any value in keeping the old (current) way of doing LDAP,
or does this patch imply that we just remove that part?

-- 
  / daniel.haxx.se
-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette:  http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html