On 4/10/10 14:53, "Daniel Stenberg" <daniel_at_haxx.se> wrote:
> But CHANGES is not a complete changelog of all changes. "git log" contains
> MUCH more details. If we wanted to generate CHANGES with git, we'd have to
> somehow mark sections of commit messages as suitable for CHANGES so that the
> unsuitable parts could be skipped. I want CHANGES to remain a fairly detailed
> log explain what we did and when, but it doesn't have to mention everything,
> like comment fixes, white space edits, spellfixes and things like that, that
> no reader will care about.

How about 'git shortlog' and enforce that people should have descriptive
subject lines for their changes?

-Josh

-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
Received on 2010-04-11