Re: [Patch] curl_multi_fdset manpage tweak
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 09:38:07 +0100
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009, Julien Chaffraix wrote:
>> My previous change is also quite limited to my testing and may be broader
>> (if a handle has finished, it could be in the fdset when we do not expect it
>> to be ..). What is the position of more knowledgeable people about libcURL:
>> does it sound sane to advice that curl_multi_perform should be called to be
>> sure that the curl_multi_fdset() results are up-to-date?
> Yes I think it is a good idea to clarify that *perform() is the key function
> that drives changes to socket states so if you want really up-to-date info
> that function should be called first.
Thanks for the reply, a new patch taking your inputs into account is
attached to this mail. I have dropped the "warning" to match the rest
of the manpages.
- text/x-patch attachment: curl_multi_fdset.diff