On Mon, 7 Sep 2009, Jamie Lokier wrote:

> Therefore, you can pick any
> function type (usually int (*)() or void (*)(), that is, pointer
> to function of unspecified arguments returning int or void) as a
> generic function pointer. When you need a place to hold object and
> function pointers interchangeably
>
> In other words, an empty argument list is *recommended* for this usage.

Ohhhhh... Thanks for this informative post. I learned something new here! ;-)

-- 
  / daniel.haxx.se