On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, Mohun Biswas wrote:

>> I still think this would be improved by saying "libcurl will then transfer
>> any data the handles in the stack are ready to deal with without blocking".

> This point seems to have gotten dropped. Do you disagree with it? If so I'll
> let it go, but I'd still like a ruling on whether my concern makes sense.

No, I quite agree with it. The non-blocking intent is not that clearly spelled
out in its man page.

-- 
  / daniel.haxx.se