On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Marek Dabek wrote:

> Ok, I agree. There will be times when someone enables SSPI without actually
> using it.

I would even be bold and say most people that have it enabled don't use it.

> But still the default SSPI behavior should be available.

You mean being able to ask for/set the default user?

> From what I've seen the empty name/pass mechanism is already in place and
> working, am I right? If so the solution will work for me as well.

Can't you try it and see how it works? And if not, work on getting it to work
perhaps?

-- 
  / daniel.haxx.se