Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Sat, 2 May 2009, koettermarkus_at_gmx.de wrote:
>
>> fixed & attached.
>
> Hey ho Markus,
>
> Do you still recall this work of yours? I was going to (finally) work on
> getting it applied and committed, but now I found that 4 out of 9
> "hunks" fail to apply. Do you think you can have a look at resyncing
> this if I'll promise to not let it rot like this again?
>

Had a quick look on
http://cool.haxx.se/cvs.cgi/curl/lib/ftp.c.diff?r2=1.516&r1=1.508&diff_format=s
to see what changed in ftp_state_use_port.
You introduced curl_socklen_t, so adjusting the patch was rather easy.

cat curl_ftpport_range_diff_20090502.diff | sed
s/socklen_t/curl_socklen_t/g >> curl_ftpport_range_diff_20090616.diff

Applied clean.

New version is attached.

Markus