2009/6/11, John E. Malmberg wrote:

> > I wonder why curlmsg_vms.h has no header inclusion guard. It would
> > make things a little bit more easy... Would there be any problem if it
> > were used?
>
> I suspect that they are not there because the original author did not think
> to put them in. I can not see how they would hurt.

I've just added header inclusion guards for curlmsg_vms.h, curlmsg.h
and config-vms.h lets hope it doesn't break anything.

Do you have some way of testing if the curlmsg.msg is still in sync
with curl.h, and dependant files curlmsg_vms.h, curlmsg.h?

-- 
-=[Yang]=-