Re: CURLOPT_LOCALPORT option broken ?!
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:55:23 +0100
On 27.02.2009, at 08:15, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> I don't. Mostly since it was once added for the reason that the
> "mere" binding wasn't enough. Thus we'd remove a feature we've
> previously added because someone needed/wanted it.
I second that. We're using this feature actively and it works for
us just fine.
Received on 2009-02-27