Re: naming convention of targets for Windows platform - why not use VC style?
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:20:58 +0100
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
> Well "zlib-ssl-dll" as an example implies using zlib and ssl to create a
> dll. libcurlMT.dll only mentions the memory model. Wouldn't it then be
> called libcurl-zlib-ssl-MT.dll?
Windows developers are not more stupid (or less smart) than unix
users. We do not have
libcurl-feature1--feature2--feature3-mode1.lib/so in other platforms
and I fail to see why we should have it on windows.
By the way, it is not the memory model but how the CRT is linked,
statically or dynamically.
> as long as we have them documented in at least a basic manner.
-- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.orgReceived on 2009-02-18