My apologizes. Clearly you're correct. This doesn't make much sense. I just wanted to get the input of the libcurl expert before I rejected the idea entirely.

Thanks.

----- Original Message ----
From: "curl-library-request_at_cool.haxx.se" <curl-library-request_at_cool.haxx.se>
To: curl-library_at_cool.haxx.se
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 5:00:02 AM
Subject: curl-library Digest, Vol 41, Issue 38

Send curl-library mailing list submissions to
    curl-library_at_cool.haxx.se

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/curl-library
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    curl-library-request_at_cool.haxx.se

You can reach the person managing the list at
    curl-library-owner_at_cool.haxx.se

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of curl-library digest..."
Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Curl and ODBC????? (Daniel Stenberg)
   2. NTLMv2 (Bharat Varma)
   3. cURL for Windows Mobile (Tanmay Anjaria)

-----Inline Message Follows-----

On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, stevekbox-one_at_yahoo.com wrote:

> Does thing even make sense?

In general these things work out better if you instead ask for things that you actually think does make sense!

I
would claim that ODBC would be stretching libcurl way too much. Also,
such a functionality wouldn't use much of libcurl's existing code but
would only share entry point and the rest would need specific code. Not
to mention that I'm not a database guy myself so I know exactly nothing
about odbc beyond from what I can read on wikipedia.

I also failed to find a defined URI/URL syntax for odbc.

So no, to me it doesn't make much sense.

-- 
/ daniel.haxx.se
_______________________________________________
curl-library mailing list
curl-library_at_cool.haxx.se
http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/curl-library