2009/1/9 A. Craig West <acraigwest_at_gmail.com>:
> It appears that having a setting for this protocol is a worthwhile
> thing, as both seem to be used in the world at large, but there
> appears to be some other problem with our connection, at least when
> using protocol 1.0. So far the only differences I am seeing with the
> IE version are the Content-Length: 0 and Pragma: no-cache headers, and
> the actual length of the Proxy-Authorization header in IE is
> considerably longer. Those are all the case in the 1.1 case as well,
> but it works then...

One other difference I forgot to mention, both browsers do not include
the port number as part of the Host: header...

-Craig
Received on 2009-01-09