On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, Jamie Lokier wrote:

> So - up to you if you still believe in the simple function :-)
>
> I'm pretty sure it's correct on anything truly POSIX. And it's obviously a
> lot less dependent on platform quirks and corner cases in many ways than the
> mktime() version.

Yeah, I think I still prefer this approach over the previous one for
simplicitly and for better control of exactly what's going on. Thanks for the
code. This has now been committed to CVS!

-- 
  / daniel.haxx.se