On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 09:26:08PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > >In English: if building without LFS, make CURLOPT_POSTFIELDSIZE_LARGE
> > >equivalent to CURLOPT_POSTFIELDSIZE.
>
> Isn't that the wrong way around - shouldn't it be if building _with_
> LFS, make CURLOPT_POSTFIELDSIZE equal to CURLOPT_POSTFIELDSIZE_LARGE
> (and the latter never changes)?

That way will be problematic for applications that *want* a non-large size.
They'll be passing in a long and libcurl will expect a long long.

>>> Dan

-- 
http://www.MoveAnnouncer.com              The web change of address service
          Let webmasters know that your web site has moved