curl-library
Re: non-blocking read function
From: Georg Lippitsch <georg.lippitsch_at_gmx.at>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 23:48:10 +0100
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 23:48:10 +0100
Am Dienstag, 30. Oktober 2007 22:28 schrieb Daniel Stenberg:
> Why 0? Why not just a CURL_MAGIC_READ_IS_NOW_PAUSED define, that certainly
> won't cause any backwards compatibility issues?
Because 0 is IMO the most logical approach.
As documentation says: "Your function must return the actual number of bytes
that you stored in that memory area"
So, if I don't store any bytes in that memory area right now, consequently 0
is the correct value to return.
Received on 2007-10-30