Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>
>> I'm looking for some details about current status of libcurl on
>> Windows CE platform. I've only read some posts in the list archives
>> from 2004 and 2005.
>>
>> Where could I find some info about current status? Is there anyone
>> developing/using libcurl on Windows CE?
>
> For some reason, people who have worked on libcurl for Windows CE never
> seem to provide any patches back to the project. That might of course
> mean that libcurl already builds sufficiently well for Windows CE.

I see.

> Did you try?

No, I didn't.
I decided to ask first, as I've seen different reports in the list
archives. One say it works, another say some headers are missing.

Certainly, I'm going to try ASAP.

> We mostly get irregular requests from people (like you) wanting it for
> Windows CE, but I have no "greater picture" of what the status is.

OK, I'll try to check this subject and provide some summary.

By the way, I'm a developer of WCELIBCEX [1] library which adds missing
features and functions to C library (and not only C library) on Windows
CE. For example, in one post in the list archives I've see there are
problems with missing errno.h etc.
WCELIBCEX tries to bring such missing features and tries to make porting
software easier.

[1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/wcelibcex

Then, if libcurl will build smoothly using native version of C library
on Windows CE, that will be cool. But if some problems will occur, I'm
going to use my WCELIBCEX if it will enable libcurl compilation.

Cheers

-- 
Mateusz Loskot
http://mateusz.loskot.net