> No it doesn't! ;-(

First of all: thank your for the fast response!

>Yes, but the existing implemenation treat both these strings the same,
>and thus I fear that changing the behaviour for any of these will
>break a lot of programs and scripts out there...

I definitely agree that a quick-fix might break existing libcurl
applications. In the long run I guess libcurl should start to support
empty headers at some point.

> Opinions? Other ideas?

The best approach I have so far is to supply a header with an empty
value enclosed in double quotes:

EmptyHeader: ""

This header should be RFC conform and supposedly fulfills the
requirement of an empty header.

Any thoughts or suggestions about this approach? It works with libcurl.

Best regards

Cyrill
Received on 2006-01-27