On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Daniel Stenberg wrote:

> On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, David Byron wrote:
>
> > I notice that curlver.h still has version 7.11.0 and
> > 7.11.0-CVS. Should these be 7.11.2 and 7.11.2-CVS?
>
> Perhaps, but I've decided to not keep them updated according
> to the releases unless I really have to. I made the release
> number get written into the file by the release script to
> avoid having to strictly manually update the version number
> every release.

Fancy. This happens in maketgz, yes? I see the numbers are properly
updated in the snapshots. Still seems like CVS should get updated when you
release something "for real", like 7.11.1, etc. so that people building from
CVS'll get the right info.

Sorry if I'm being a pain.

-DB
Received on 2004-03-31