On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 04:38, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
>
> > ... No, I think you're right. The patch was not enough. I'll work on it some
> > more and get back.
>
> I believe you should apply this patch ON TOP of the other one, and it works
> better.

A problem - I applied patch one to file.c - but then when I attempt a
dry run of the second patch, it fails:

[jnoller_at_jnoller lib]$ patch file.c fileprogress.patch
patching file file.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 175 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 262 (offset 1 line).
[jnoller_at_jnoller lib]$ patch --dry-run file.c fileprogress2.patch
patching file file.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 83.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file file.c.rej
patching file transfer.c
[jnoller_at_jnoller lib]$

This is with curl-7.11.1-20040303 - I am going to grab today's daily and
try again.
Received on 2004-03-05